Section 230

Case interpreting immunities for online platforms under the Communications Decency Act.

1. McClain v. Warren

2. Jurisdiction: United States (May 20, 2025)
3. Original Case: McClain v. Warren et al
4. Victims<![CDATA[无]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[James McClain]]>Investigators<![CDATA[无]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[无]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[无]]>Judges<![CDATA[无]]>Institutions<![CDATA[U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]>
5. Case Tags: Defamation;Public Figure;Actual Malice;Section 230

1. Hatzimichaels v. Moon

2. Jurisdiction: United States (August 11, 2025)
3. VictimsElena HatzimichaelsDefendantsMarcus MoonPlaintiffsElena HatzimichaelsInvestigatorsSarah ChenProsecutorsLaura MitchellDefense AttorneysDavid SterlingPlaintiff AttorneysKaren WalkerJudgesRobert ThompsonInstitutionsCook County Circuit CourtChicago Police Department
4. Case Tags: Defamation;Artificial Intelligence;Deepfake;Section 230

1. Doe #1 et al v. MG Freesites LTD et al

2. Jurisdiction: United States (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California) (May 6, 2025 (complaint filing date))
3. Key Figures: Plaintiffs: Jane Doe 1 through 10, anonymous individuals and others similarly situated; Defendants: MG Freesites LTD (a subsidiary of Aylo, formerly MindGeek), and unnamed affiliated entities operating adult tube sites.
4. Case Tags: Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM);Sex Trafficking;Platform Liability;Section 230