Confrontation Clause

Plaintiff argued that video conferencing denied the right to confront witnesses in person.

1. Swint v. Northern District Court

2. Jurisdiction: United States (April 7, 2025)
3. Victims<![CDATA[None]]>Defendants<![CDATA[Northern District Court]]>Plaintiffs<![CDATA[Swint]]>Investigators<![CDATA[None]]>Prosecutors<![CDATA[None]]>Defense Attorneys<![CDATA[U.S. Department of Justice]]>Plaintiff Attorneys<![CDATA[None]]>Judges<![CDATA[None]]>Institutions<![CDATA[United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama]]>
4. Case Tags: Federal Court Immunity;Remote Hearing Due Process;Confrontation Clause;Judicial Digitalization